Showing posts with label soil microbiology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label soil microbiology. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Spring Root-flush



 
Spring Root-flush
Winter dormancy is an important development stage in the tree growth cycle. During this time period crops rest and recharge for the upcoming growing season. Both cold air and soil temperatures are required to supply much needed “chill hours” for resting trees. “Chill hours” are a lot like REM sleep to you and me. REM sleep is the nightly deep-sleep that is vital for keeping us healthy and well rested upon awakening. Simply put, trees need cold temperatures to slow (or stop) their growth activities. When temperatures are too mild, trees do not receive adequate “chill hours” and break dormancy in an energy-deficit condition. In other words, trees don’t sleep well and awaken stressed.
 


 
Spring root-flush:
In California, normally happens with prunus species like almond, early peach, plum, nectarine, apricot and cherry varieties, in the 3rd to 4th week of January. This activity begins when soil temperature (in top 2-4”) reaches 45°F and precedes bloom by approximately three weeks. Buds visibly swell with water and nutrients. The new hair-root growth is needed to support the upcoming crop with water and nutrients. Once root-flush is underway, growers should take advantage by beginning fertigation or soil fertility applications. Nutrient focus should be on root health and crop support.
 
Temperature:
Soil temperature is a major driving factor in the onset of spring rootflush. Currently, soil temperatures, in California are 50-52°F (well above 45°F) due to the high volume of rain (4-5”) that has fallen in the past four to five weeks and continues to saturate much of the state. California has another 4-6” of rain forecast in the next week. Due to this increase in soil temperature, rootflush is now underway.
 
Chill hours:
Another concern is that “chill hours” are below normal for early January and trees are not getting the rest they need. Rootflush is underway and therefore so is root respiration. Respiration is the plant process of “burning up” or releasing stored nutrient energy for plant use. This is a problem because new roots are using up nutrient energy that is meant for the upcoming bloom.  Due to these circumstances, an energy deficit is beginning that cannot be restored from dormant rest. If you enter the bloom stage in an energy deficit (stressed) condition, it will affect the plant’s ability to pollinate, set and “stick” crop. One symptom of bloom stress is “June drop”. Plants self-regulate by aborting excess crop to ensure they do not run short on nutrients. They are programmed to know how much crop load they can support based on their health and availability of nutrition.
 
Feed the Soil:
When short on “chill hours”, the next-best alternative is to supply energy to the plant via “plant-ready” nutrition. Treatment emphasis should be on the soil, since the roots are already at work. Using an orthophosphate source provides much needed “plant-ready” phosphorus for root growth and health. A unique root benefit is a fungicide-like response within the rootzone. This is especially important in waterlogged conditions. Unlike polyphosphate fertilizers, orthophosphate is not temperature dependent. This means it is readily absorbed by new roots in cold soil temperatures (<63-68°F). In addition to feeding the soil, this is also an ideal time to re-inoculate the rhizosphere with soil microbiology. The more diverse your soil microbiology, the better your soil-nutrient and water efficiency you will experience. Dr. William Albrecht said, “We must not forget that microbes are what make a living soil ‘alive’…microbes, eat at the first sitting…Plants eat second. Plants and microbes must be in symbiotic activity and not in competition for fertility if our productive soils are to be maintained.” So, how productive are your soils? As the farmer, it is good stewardship to know and make necessary adjustments to nurture the soil and ensure it is still productive for the next generation.
Here’s to your success!
 


 

 


 
 

 

 

Friday, September 16, 2016

Citrus and Cold, Waterlogged Winter Soil management



Freezing Temperatures in young citrus block.

Winter can be a challenging time for growing citrus. While these conditions can vary from year to year, it pays to be prepared for the worst…just in case.
During extreme temperatures, plants are put under a high stress load and often maturing a crop at the same time. This creates an added level of severity to the plant stress. There are many options for dealing with freezing conditions. Today, let’s concentrate on managing “waterlogged”, cold soils.
As a soil and plant nutritionist, I focus on good, balanced soil and plant nutrition to best equip plants to tend to themselves even during stress events. It takes time to adjust soil nutrient levels when they are imbalanced and time is a limiting factor, when Mother Nature comes calling with freezing temperatures. Soil nutrient levels, especially the Base Saturation cations (K+, Ca++, Mg++, Na+ and H+), should be based upon the soil texture (sand, silt or clay) and adding “more” than what is needed, is not better. This is especially true with calcium and magnesium. Calcium creates pore space and affects the amount of air in the soil. Having surplus amounts of calcium can have a negative impact and actually compete against other needed cations, like potassium and magnesium, by displacing them. Magnesium is equally important, as it affects the soil’s moisture level and like calcium, too much magnesium can create tight-soil conditions that limit water percolation and/or competition with other needed cations. Together, these two need to make up 80% of the total Base Saturation of cations and directly affect your soil-water efficiency and percolation rate. A correct Ca:Mg ratio (i.e. 68% Ca:12% Mg) is important to nutrient efficacy all year round…but especially in times of water saturation and cold soil.
Irrigation water is used to manage cold temperatures and provide affordable protection of a few degrees; it can be the difference between protected and freeze damaged fruit. When this must be done for an extended period of time, the water is applied faster than the plant and/or soil can move it through the soil profile and field saturation occurs. Water saturation creates multiple issues, while cold/freezing air temperatures are present already (stressor); the rootzone is deoxygenated due to irrigation water (stressor), plants are often nutrient deficient due to cold soil temperatures (stressor) and if trees are sprayed with a canopy protectant, respiration is dramatically reduced (stressor). This is a bad mix of stressors, but it happens more often than you might expect.
 
Soil Microbiology - The Missing Link...
Microbiology is foundational to soil health, efficient water usage and nutrient availability/uptake. Applying specific strains of microbiology in the fall, helps prepare the plant and rootzone for wintertime stress events. There are many species and subspecies available, so getting the right type(s) is important.
 
During winter we know certain things to be true:
1.      Phosphate is energy and necessary for plant vitality and to manage stress.
2.      All nutrients, with the exception of nitrogen, move into the plant in phosphate form.
3.      All nutrients, with the exception of nitrogen, are unable to move from the soil/rootzone into the plant until the soil temperature reaches 65 °F.
4.      Nitrogen (nitrate) is a mass-flow mover and susceptible to leaching with heavy amounts of water.
5.      “Waterlogged” soil is depleted of oxygen. Roots cannot grow without oxygen and can actually start to die in 24-48 hours depending on the severity of the conditions.
6.      “Waterlogged” soils stimulate anaerobic microbial activity that feed on the organic matter/humus in the soil and produce methane gas (waste-product), which is highly toxic to roots. This condition will not improve until the rootzone gets air re-introduced into it (oxygenation).
Now, with that in mind, you can see why good, balanced nutrition and nutrient availability is so important. Microbiological activity makes this a reality. Let’s look at how certain groups of microbiology help during cold, wet, winter conditions.
To keep things simple, let’s focus on just two groups that are beneficial in keeping the rootzone active and aerated. Lactobacillus and Yellow soil yeast. Both are proficient at producing high levels of true organic acids (O.A.), right in the rootzone; some of these are citric, acetic, lactic, malic, gluconic, etc. These types of O.A.s are more efficient than humic or fulvic acids as they act much akin to plant enzymes. They are very proficient at “cleaving” fixed nutrients from soil particles and also in keeping them available for later plant use…even during winter. These Organic Acids are not temperature dependent and are exceptional “plant-ready” chelating agents for moving nutrients into plants that would otherwise not be usable until the soil warms. In fact, adding these types of microbes and the O.A.s they produce to your soil will also lessen nitrogen leaching, by conversion into “plant-ready”, non-leachable forms, like proteins and amino acids. In these forms, the nitrogen is stored within the root system for later use, when needed.

In addition to the nutrient chelating plant benefit, the microbiology also increases the oxygen (O2) capacity of the soil through the production of carbon dioxide (CO2). A byproduct of active microbes is CO2 production. Therefore, a benefit of higher microbial population and activity is an increased CO2 level. As CO2 is released, it ascends rapidly to the soil surface and creates tiny pores in the soil. It is much the same, as when you pour a carbonated drink into a glass and the CO2 gases (fizzes) off rapidly. Now imagine the gassing/fizzing action in your soda glass, but from within the rootzone rising up to the soil surface. “Gas exchange” occurs when CO2 reaches the soil surface and releases to the atmosphere. This rapid rising creates a vacuum within the soil pores and, as a result, oxygen is pulled back down into the soil (oxygenation) via the pores to maintain equilibrium.
Another benefit from Lactobacillus is in the production of bacteriocins. Bacteriocins are specialized natural antibiotics and antibiotic-like compounds. They are vital to maintain soil, root and plant health within the rootzone. They are both gram- and gram+ compounds that directly antagonize methanogenesis anaerobes and soil borne pathogens.
In essence, by adding these specific strains of microbiology you are altering the microbial population to your benefit.
Fall soil inoculation will build microbial population and diversity, in time, to combat the cold, wet soil issues of winter for a better soil and crop response.
Adding microbiology is not a substitute for balanced soil nutrition, but it is an important tool in making your existing soil nutrients more efficient and available for plant use.

 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Photosynthesis - 101a

Photo credit: Marc Suderman


PhotosynthesisEveryone, everywhere benefits from plants; specifically from Photosynthesis. It’s the plant process that takes water (6H2O), carbon dioxide (6CO2) and sunlight (energy) and transforms them, into glucose (C6H12O6) and oxygen (6O2) during daylight hours. This supplies food for plants and oxygen (and food) for the rest of us. It is the most vitally important activity on earth.

Approximately 95% of all plant structures are made up of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen…95%! These are taken from the air via the photosynthetic process. While this is a plant activity, it is dependent upon a living, nutrient-rich soil for supplying water and the necessary mineral nutrition, which cannot be gotten from the air. The mineral nutrition is the part where we have a direct effect; the 5%. To make this dynamic system work well requires “give-and-take” action. There’s a symbiotic relationship between plants and soil (biology). Plants need what only the microbes can provide and are unable to get for themselves and vice versa. Plants make sugars and soil microbes eat sugars. Soil microbes liberate soil-bound minerals that plants cannot release, but need for survival; interdependence. Of the sugars produced, plants use ⅓ of these photosynthates within the canopy and the remaining ⅔ are sent down into the root system. This is a win-win arrangement. The more diverse and active the rhizosphere (the area surrounding plant roots where microbes live), the more the food demand will be, but this also means there is more reproduction too. This will improve nutrient translocation for better plant health and therefore higher glucose production for better rootzone health. This creates, in effect, a perpetuating action between soil and plant.

Plants are made to be in the sun. They are designed to absorb sunlight and the heat that comes with it. Summer brings plenty of sunlight and higher temperatures. A healthy canopy should provide food and protection to the developing crop, but sometimes there are limitations to the canopy’s effectiveness. These can be a challenge at critical stages of development and can cause problems for growers. A good understanding of the key growth stages for your crop is important. This can help you better plan for potential stressors, like weather, drought, bloom, fruit set, fruit fill, etc. Designing a fertility plan for the nutrient demands of growing crops (before they need them) and emphasizing key nutrients, like phosphate, magnesium, iron, boron, manganese, etc. to lessen plant stressors and promote better plant/soil health via the photosynthetic process, is in your best interest. Dan Skow wrote, in Mainline Farming for Century 21, “In photosynthesis there is one limiting factor, in putting sugars into plants, namely phosphate...” For instance, excessive light and heat can cause plant stress. The Stress is not the problem, but a symptom of the Problem, namely nutrient deficiency. Considering every nutrient, with the exception of nitrogen, enters the plant in phosphate form, shows how key a nutrient this is to overall plant health and function. In calcareous soils, this is a challenge. Adding specialized soil microbiology will provide an ample soil phosphate supply and plants respond by building larger, thicker, hardier leaves that are better suited to care for themselves. These are plants’ solar panels and the better they are equipped for “catching” sunlight, the better the sugar production. The number of layers [in the mesophyll] varies, principally due to nutrition. More layers mean a thicker leaf, more photosynthesis, and more crop.” wrote Dr. Arden B. Andersen in Science in Agriculture. Thicker leaves have a larger storage volume and higher solute (sugars) content. As a result, this gives a plant more resistance to rising ambient temperatures and helps to regulate its internal temperature better. This also allows the guard cells of the stomata to remain open longer into the day before shutting down to conserve water. More photosynthetic production yields more energy and more energy equates to more plant health. It takes healthy plants to grow nutrient-rich food. The crop produced can be nothing more than the “nutrient-template” provided it from the diet of the parent-plant; “Garbage in, garbage out” or “You are what you eat”. Making assumptions about the soundness of your fertility plan without verifying with timely tissue testing can prove to be costly. Growing high quality fruits or vegetables doesn’t just happen. It’s a lot like trying to hit a moving target. It requires a good plan and execution to get good canopy efficiency. The opposite is also true, if anything occurs to limit a plant’s ability to absorb sunlight and build photosynthates. I mention this because; summer is a critical time for fruit bud development which happens concurrently with all other plant operations and can place added energy/nutrient demands, onto a plant. Deficiencies, at this stage, can ill-affect production for the coming year. Remember, the higher the photosynthetic efficiency, the better equipped a plant is to address all plant issues. This includes generating high quality crops and higher quality equals better ship-ability and shelf-life. But, to do this takes energy (sugars). Plants “bundle” sugars to form primary and secondary metabolites. It takes ten times more energy to produce secondary plant metabolites than glucose. Without secondary metabolites, strong, high quality, nutrient dense fruits or vegetables are not possible. This is directly dependent upon how well plants photosynthesize. Bottom line: When plant glucose production fails to meet plant demands, crop quality suffers. Don’t let this happen to you!
 
 

Photosynthesis, on the surface, can be assumed to be nothing more than the plant activity of absorbing sunshine and growing. But, it is a very complex process; one that works for you, but can be limited or benefitted by your fertility plan, both in the soil and the plant. Nutrition has a major influence on crop yield, plant health and soil response. Fertilizing a crop, with good intentions doesn’t guarantee good results. Regular and timely tissue and soil testing are useful tools for tracking your growing progress. Fertilizers and lab testing cost you money, but so does delivering a crop that has sub-par quality, size, color, brix, firmness, etc. on your bottom line. Utilizing test results to make timely nutrient decisions is good stewardship. Good stewardship is also making sure your plant’s canopy is functioning at a high level of efficiency to support your efforts to produce the best crop possible each and every year.

Here’s to your harvest success!

Monday, May 23, 2016

Soil Management by Nature or Man? - Natural Food and Farming: 1965





In our studies of how Mother Nature was growing crops which were able to protect themselves against pests and disease to survive the ages, and to be available for domestication by man when he took over the soil and crop management, we find that two basic requirements had always been met or fulfilled.

In the first place, rock minerals were weathering in the soil to remind us of the poetic claim that "The Mills of God must grind.” In the second place, the organic matter grown on the soil was naturally put back in place on top or within the soil for its decay there. That served to put microbial life into the soil. It generated the carbonic acid there (and other acids of decay) to break some of the nutrient elements out of the rock more rapidly for them to be caught up and held, or adsorbed, by some of the more stable, weathered, non-nutrient elements like the silicon of the clay. That adsorption holds them for plants services when the plant uses the same kind of carbonic acid to take those nutrients off by trading the hydrogen, or acid, for them.
 
By means of grinding fresh rock regularly as natural mineral fertilizers in the soil, and by conserving the organic matter to go back to maintain the soil’s humus at higher levels, nature had protected her crops so they grew annually from their own seeds. By a unique self protection they were doing well when man came along to take over what we call “scientific” crop management and “scientific” soil management. Certainly we are not now duplicating those practices in which nature was more successful than we appreciate.


According to our knowledge to date, the soil’s total capacity to hold electrically positive nutrients in available form should have about 60-75% for calcium, 6-12% for magnesium, 3-5% for potassium, and not more than that much of sodium and also all the needed trace elements and non-nutrient hydrogen, or acidity.
Those figures represent the soil’s content of positively charged elements in what, to date, we may consider a balanced plant ration… In our preceding remarks, we have not spoken about the soil’s organic supplies of nitrogen, sulfur and phosphorus in the required plant’s ration. We have not mentioned some of the trace elements also connected more actively with the supply of organic matter than with the reserve minerals.

We need to look to the organic matter of the soil to make these last three more essential major nutrient elements available to the crops. We need to remind ourselves that it is the organic matter that makes the surface layer the “living soil” and the “handful of dust” with its power for creating life.
We must not forget that microbes are what make a living soil “alive.” And far more important, we must remember that soil microbes, like all other microbes, eat at the first sitting, or first table. Plants eat at the second. Microbes go first for energy food, since they cannot use the sunshine’s energy directly. Plants go first for “grow” food, since they can use sunshine energy that way.

A sprouting seed “roots” for a living, or for “grow” food first. It puts up its advertising of growth by showing its leaves above the soil in the sunshine second.
 
Microbes are the decomposers of the organic matter and the conservers of the inorganic fertility, of the nitrogen, of the sulphur and of the phosphorus. Those three elements do not escape so much from a soil which has plenty of organic matter and growing crops to conserve those elements. We need to consider organic matter to conserve, to mobilize and to increase the nitrogen, the sulfur and the phosphorus of the soils, if those are to be fully productive.
Soil microbes oxidize carbon, nitrogen, sulfur and phosphorus to get energy thereby. It is in their oxidized forms that those elements are taken into the plant. Carbon is taken into the leaves. The others are taken into the plant root and, thus, all are in cycles of re-use.
It was by that more complete recycling for conservation that nature built up the soil in organic matter which we are compelling our microbes to burn out so rapidly when we return primarily chemical salts and little carbon of organic matter by which in this combination for microbial service, these fertility elements must be held in the soil. Plants and microbes must be in symbiotic activity and not in competition for fertility if our productive soils are to be maintained.
Carbon, nitrogen, sulphur and phosphorus are the negatively charged elements with which the positively charged hydrogen, calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium combine to make the readily soluble inorganic salts. But in those combined forms they are not held by the soil as such. They are ionically injurious to plant roots. They are leached out by percolating rainwater. It is the clay-humus part of the soil which filters the positively charged ions, or elements, out of those salts; much like the household water softener takes the calcium, or lime, hardness out of the water supply. The clay-humus holds them as insoluble, yet available, to plant roots which are trading acid, or hydrogen, for them.
 
The negatively charged, soluble nitrates, sulfates, phosphates, so oxidized by the microbes, serve as nutrition for them and for the plants to be reduced into the organo-molecular states of living tissue where they are insoluble but functional in large organic molecules and not as salts. On death, they are oxidized again for microbial energy and repeat the cycle.
It is in this natural plan of soil management where we must recognize the real service by the fertility elements of soil, air and water playing their roles in creation before we can take over for wiser management of nature’s part in crop production. Her two phases of management stand out. Nature returned the organic matter as completely as possible, in that she held many of the fertility elements and kept them available. She grew crops where she also added unweathered mineral salts and dusts through winds with their storms of such and by overflowing waters with their inwash of deposited minerals.
By that simple, two-phase procedure of fertility management, nature had many different crops of healthy plants here for man when he arrived. But each crop was on its own particularly suitable soil in its specific climatic, geo-chemical and balanced fertility setting with man and warm-blooded animals on the high-calcium soils. We have not yet included calcium as the foremost fertility element when we list the contents of commercial fertilizers, for the inspector, even though we lime the soil to combat its acidity and, thereby, work against the very mechanism by which the plant roots feed our crops.
Feed the soil and it will feed you.
- Excerpts from: Natural Food and Farming: 1965—The Albrecht Papers Vol. 1
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 


Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Soil Microbes Get Their Food First


 

It was less than three generations ago that Pasteur’s work in France suggested the bacterial causation of disease. Even though we are coming to see that the bacterial entry into the body may be encouraged by weakness induced by deficiencies of many kinds, yet the fear of microbes, germs and bacteria is almost universal. Everybody is afraid of getting germs. Pasteur told us that heat is the best weapon for fighting these microscopic life forms and we have been heating, boiling, steaming and sterilizing in the fight against microbes.

Now that the science of microbiology has brought us penicillin, streptomycin and other similar microbial products as protection for our bodies against the microbes, particularly since we are learning to live with them more for our benefit than for our harm. We are coming to see that microbes are a foundational part of the pyramid of life forms, of which we are the topmost. If we are to live complacently with them, we must remember that they are next to the soil in that pyramidal structure. They are between the soil and the plants. They either cooperate with, or compete with, the plants for the creative power in the form of nutrients in the soil. Hence, they are a part of the biotic foundation on which animal and human life depend. Microbes are now recognized as important because they eat more simply than all other life. They also eat first of the fertility of the soil.

1.      struggle for calories

Microbes are less complex in their anatomy and in many respects are less highly developed than plants. Unlike plants, the microbes cannot make their own energy-food compounds by the help of sunlight. On the contrary, sunlight kills microbes. By the process of photosynthesis, plants build their own carbohydrates for body energy from carbon dioxide in the air and from hydrogen and oxygen in water from the soil. Plants make many carbonaceous complexes from these three simple elements which they build into intricate energy-giving compounds of high fuel value and as deposits above the soil or as additions within its surface layer. Plants work in the light. Microbes work in the dark. Unable to derive energy directly from the sun, they must get it from these chemical compounds passed on to them by the death of the plants.

As a means of getting energy for heat and work, the microbes burn or oxidize organic compounds, just as we do in our bodies. Microbial life depends on just such compounds as make up dead plant and animal bodies. It simplifies them. It tears them apart. It is the wrecking crew taking over dead plant and animal tissues or return the separate elemental parts back to the air, water, soil or other points of origin. It is working in the dark and sending back to simplicity all that the plants built up to complexity.

This microbial struggle is what we call decay. The process of rotting organic matter is the result of microbial processes of digestion and metabolism of the organic matter, by which the energy initially put into chemical combination through plant photosynthesis, is released again for microbial life service.

As humans, we too use organic compounds such as sugars, starches, proteins, fat and other food components to provide our energy. This occurs as part of the process by which we break down these compounds into carbon dioxide, water, urea and other simple substances eventually thrown off as body excretions. Humans, like the microbes, are struggling for calories. In humans we call it digestion and metabolism. For the microbes, it means decay, or the simplification process which the different substances are undergoing when we commonly say “They are rotting.”

2.      competition with crops

Plowing under some organic matter in the garden or field is a good way of disposing of crop residues because the microbes “burn” or oxidize them. They do it slowly, however. Yet the process of microbial combustion of such materials may have disastrous effects on a crop planted soon after plowing, when we say we “burned out” the crop.

Microbes need more than energy “go” foods. They need the “grow” foods, too, just as we do. They do not demand that their nitrogen be given them in the complete proteins or the more complex compounds of this element as we do. Nevertheless, they are just as exacting in their needs for nitrogen, at least in its simpler forms. This is a “grow” food necessary to balance their energy foods in the proper ratio just as we demand the balance in speaking of our own nutritive ratio, or the balance of carbohydrates against proteins in our own diets or in the ration of feeds for our domestic animals.

So when we plow under any woody residue of stalks, leaves or other parts of plants that have given up their protein contents for seed making, these residues are an unbalanced microbial diet. They do not permit the microbes to grow rapidly on them. They are too much carbohydrate. As a diet they are deficient in “grow” foods. They are short in proteins, or nitrogen, and in minerals, hence decay very slowly.

Woody crop residues, like straws, have long been used for roof covers in the Old World. They last well but need to be replaced more often at the ridge top than over the entire roof. It is at the ridge tops that birds sit more often to leave their droppings, which are rich in urea nitrogen. When this soluble nitrogen – along with the mineral salts of the bird droppings – is added to the straw, the first rain hastens its decay. This decay, however, is limited to the ridge of the roof, or to the area in which these supplements of nitrogen balance the microbial diet originally consisting of straw. Until this balance was brought about the straw was too carbonaceous to decay, and was good thatch. Microbes require little of the “grow” foods but without it they do not carry out their decay processes.

When strawy crop residues or sawdust, for example, are plowed into the soil, the soil microbes are offered a diet that is high in carbon, or energy, and low in bodybuilding foods. Since the microbes are well distributed throughout this plowed soil, they are in such intimate contact with the clay that they make colloidal exchanges with it for its available nutrients. They can take ammonia nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, calcium and other nutrients for their own growth from the clay to balance the sawdust as a more adequate diet.

It is unfortunate for the plants when woody residues are plowed under. When the microbes are more intimately in contact with the soil than are the plant roots, the microbes eat first of the available fertility elements. While the microbes are balancing their sawdust diet by taking the fertility of the soil into their own body compounds, we do not appreciate the production of the microbial crop, nor the proportion of the available fertility which they appropriate for their own needs. Instead we see how poorly the corn crop or other plants grow when planted soon after straw, heavy weeds or sawdust are plowed under. We say “The crop is burned out,” when it is extra fertility and not water that is needed. Yes, the microbes eat first. This disaster follows inevitably when the soil is too low in fertility to feed both the microbial crop within and the farm crop above the soil.

But unfortunately the disaster is only temporary. While the energy compounds are being consumed, the excessive carbon is escaping to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. The nitrogen and inorganic nutrient elements are kept within the soil. Thus while the carbon supply in the soil is being lessened by volatilization, the ratios of the carbon to the nitrogen and to the inorganic elements are made more narrow. These ratios approach that of the microbial body composition – more nearly that of protein.

Thus by decay the straw with a carbon-nitrogen ration of 80 to 1 leaves microbially manipulated residues going toward what we call “humus” and toward a carbon-nitrogen ratio of nearly 12 to 1. This resulting substance is then more nearly like the chemical composition of the microbes themselves. So when no large, new supplies of carbonaceous organic matter are added to the soil, new microbes can grow only by consuming their predecessors or the humus residues of their creation.

Humus residues, used as food by the microbes, comprise a diet low in energy values, but high in body-building values. Humus is also unbalanced, but unlike straw, it is unbalanced in the opposite respect. It is not badly unbalanced, because “grow” foods, like proteins, can be “burned” for energy. Man can live by meat (protein) alone, as Steffanson and other Arctic explorers have demonstrated. It is a bit costly, however, so we use carbohydrates to balance the protein. In that case the proteins are going for tissue building rather than to provide energy. The microbes also can use protein-like compounds for energy and very effectively. We encourage them to do this when we plow under legumes. Here again they balance their own diets but with benefit to the crop above the soil, rather than with disaster which follows the plowing under of straw.

When we plow under proteinaceous organic matter, such as legumes, with not only a high content of nitrogen but also a high content of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium and all the other inorganic nutrient elements, the microbes are placed on a diet of narrow carbon-nitrogen ratio. The ratio of carbon to the inorganic nutrients is also narrow. It is like an exclusively meat diet would be for us, or like a tankage diet would be for a pig. The energy foods in such a ration are low in supply. Conversely, the nitrogen and minerals are a surplus. This surplus is not built into microbial bodies. Instead, it is liberated in simpler forms which are left in the soil as fertilizers for farm crops.

What we plow under determines what we have as left-overs for the crops. The microbes always eat first. The crops we grow “eat at the second table.” In wise management of the soil we must consider whether the composition of the organic matter we plow under is a good or poor diet for the microbes. If the soil is so low in fertility that it grows only a woody crop to be plowed under, then there can be little soil improvement for the following crop. It gives the microbes only energy foods. They must exhaust still further the last fertility supply in the soil to balance their diet and consequently the crops starve.

But if the soil is high in fertility so that it grows legumes, and if we then plow these protein-rich, mineral-rich forages under, the microbes receive more than energy foods. Given the nitrogenous, fertility-laden green manures plowed under, they pass this fertility back to the soil. Here their struggle is for energy, a struggle by which they are not in competition with the crop, the energy for which comes not from the soil but from the sunshine instead.

Microbes eat first. On poor soil with little humus and inorganic fertility, this spells disaster to the farm crop if we plow under only the poor vegetation which such soils produce. Growing merely any kind of organic matter to let it go back to the soil is not lifting the soil to higher fertility; any more than one lifts himself by pulling on his bootstraps. On soils that are more fertile in mineral nutrients, the idea in plowing cover crops to turn under is to help the farm crop. It helps them if we plow under the more proteinaceous and leguminous cover vegetation which fertile soils produce.

While we have been mining our soils to push them to a lower level of fertility, the microbes that originally were working for us are now working against us. They are eating first, not only so far as the plants are concerned, but indirectly so far as even we and our animals are concerned.

It is in this competition with the microbes that inorganic fertilizers and mineral additions to the soil can play their role by balancing the microbial diet. Such minerals are taken by both the plants and the microbes. But if the fertilizers are put deeper into the soil, they may be below the layer where they affect the microbes, either favorably or unfavorably. They will serve the plants, which send their roots down there, under the power coming from the sunshine. They will not affect the microbes unless they are mixed into the humus-bearing surface soil. Putting the fertilizers down deeper puts their nutrient contents where the plants, rather than the microbes, eat first. This is fertilizing, by means of inorganics, the fertilizing crop that combines them with organics to serve the microbes when this fertilizing crop is turned under for true soil improvement. This is a way of composting the inorganics within the body of the soil itself.

-          Excerpt from The Albrecht Papers Vol.1 - 1948

Popular Posts

Previous Blog Posts

Sponsor

Navigation